by Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

An important two-day lawyers’ conference was held in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, on 30–31 August 2025, where a new discourse on legal practice was initiated. Shanta Kumar, president of the AP chapter, did an excellent job organizing the event, which was hosted by the Indian Lawyers Association (ILA). The AP chapter’s conference drew about 700 lawyers.

ILA’s founder-president, Srikanth Chintala—a young constitutional lawyer from the Telangana High Court—is working to build a well-informed legal team committed to defending the oppressed. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, former Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, was the chief guest. He is especially known for declaring at his oath ceremony that “he was elevated to that office because of Ambedkar and the constitution he gave to India.” As the first Dalit Chief Justice of an RSS/BJP-controlled state, his appointment became both newsworthy and controversial.

I, too, was a speaker at the event.

Shifting Ideologies in Judiciary and Policing

Across the country, right-wing forces have established significant ideological influence on the courts and the legal community, promoting the idea that courts and police should follow Sanatana Dharma rather than constitutional morality. This conference sought to reset constitutional morality as the guiding principle for the judicial system nationwide. Increasingly, judges in higher courts are demanding that lawyers justify their arguments with references to the Ramayana, Mahabharata, Manu Dharma Shastra, or Kautilya’s Arthashastra, instead of the Constitution, Cr.P.C., and IPC. The criteria for judicial appointments may, over time, shift to a candidate’s knowledge of Sanskrit texts rather than foundational legal documents.

In one court, while Srikanth himself was arguing a case using evidence from the Constitution and relevant precedents, the judge pressed Srikanth, asking, “Did you read the Bhagavad Gita?” Srikanth replied that “he read the Indian Constitution, not the Bhagavad Gita.” The judge nearly shouted in response, nearly calling him in contempt of court. 

This trend is not isolated. There is a growing judicial inclination toward Sanatana nationalism. Should RSS/BJP dominance continue for some years, police FIRs may be written with reference to Sanskrit Sanatana literature rather than the Constitution, IPC, or Cr.P.C.

This pattern mirrors that of Muslim monarchies, where legal decisions are guided more by the Quran than by secular law. Ironically, Hindutva forces seek to replicate this model.

Defending the Oppressed Within Changing Systems

The conference expressed concern about the judiciary and police’s changing tendencies and the ways this endangers oppressed castes and communities. It emphasized educating lawyers on how to fight in courts at every level with a new consciousness, efficiency, and commitment to the life, liberty, and property of the oppressed.

For judicial and police officers, adherence to Sanatana ideology often becomes a path to promotion, given the preferences of current rulers. Delhi’s ruling class and RSS leaders place more value in Sanatana Dharma texts than in the present Constitution. These traditional texts have, for centuries, facilitated the oppression and exploitation of Shudra, OBC, Dalit, and Adivasi masses. Officers from these groups often conform to prevailing ideology to secure their positions and advance. Corruption is overlooked as long as the individual aligns with the rulers’ ideology.

The Imperative for Competent Legal Advocacy

A key question addressed by the conference was how lawyers must fight for the poor and oppressed in a caste- and male-dominated legal system that increasingly reinforces those hierarchies.

There was extensive discussion on the need for rural and urban poor, and especially first-generation lawyers, to acquire command of English, given that court proceedings operate almost exclusively in that language. While the RSS/BJP push for court use of regional languages—mainly Hindi—the Supreme Court recently held that “such translations cannot be considered authentic.” Only the English version is treated as official in courts. Lawyers arguing cases in regional languages cannot effectively shape written judgments. Clear and persuasive English arguments improve a lawyer’s chances of winning. Thus, mastery of English is more vital for court practice than for universities.

In Western countries, courts and police never write FIRs or judgments by referencing the Bible. Srikanth reminded participants that the first known cross-examination in a court before a judge comes from the Bible’s Book of Daniel, with no such precedent in Indian Sanskrit texts. There is no notion of justice in Manu Dharma—only caste duties. While the Bhagavad Gita offers moral guidance, on many points Krishna’s statements are hostile to Shudra and Chandala castes, and the concept of caste-free justice is absent from these texts.

For example, in the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna judges that even if Karna wins Draupadi’s Swayamvara, she may still refuse to marry him because he is a Shudra, even though the rules did not bar Shudra/Chandalas from competing. Such judgments are celebrated as “Dharma,” though they are, by contemporary standards, deeply unjust.

Indian courts only recognise written history, not oral tradition. In ancient Sanskrit sources, productive castes long remained under the dominance of the three Dwija castes. What those upper castes did to the lower castes was considered Dharma, meaning equality was unknown until Dr. Ambedkar’s Constitution articulated such a principle.

Lawyers defending the oppressed must understand the legacy and ideology behind Sanatana Dharma and the Sanskrit texts that sustain it.

Sustaining Constitutional Democracy

The ILA conference took up a comprehensive discussion of all forms of Indian jurisprudence. Ambedkar, the first genius lawyer from the oppressed communities, set an example for defending the marginalized.

Notably, several judges participated as speakers and attendees, repeatedly affirming that the survival of constitutional democracy in India depends on the legal community. The Constitution itself is the outcome of legal minds from around the world, and Ambedkar drew from the world’s positive legal philosophies in drafting it.

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is The Shudra Rebellion.

https://countercurrents.org/2025/09/repositioning-indian-lawyers-in-defence-of-the-poor/

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

Bharat Jodo Yatra and #VoterAdhikarYatra are showing new mobilisation in terms of social reform in the electoral process as well as society.

File Image

Recently one English television news channel conducted a typical ‘state of the nation’ survey and declared that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi got 25% preferential votes for the Prime Minister’s post and Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Narendra Modi got 52%.

If one conducts such polls in a communally-instilled population, a secular socio-political reform leader would certainly get less votes.

Such mobile phone surveys might show some trend but what the media is under-estimating is the long-term impact of Rahul Gandhi’s fight for reforms in the Indian socio-political system, which will do greater good to the country.  If the regional parties go with Rahul Gandhi in the real elections, such online polls will go haywire. 

If Rahul Gandhi becomes Prime Minister with such reform politics for human equality and social justice, Indian history will remember him, just as the Americans remember Abraham Lincoln. But the Indian media is also against his fight to shape India in a reformed mode.   

UNEXPECTED RISE OF RAHUL GANDHI

Rahul Gandhi is a persecuted Opposition leader with his party holding a 100 seats Parliament. He faces several cases that have been slapped just to harass him. He led the Congress party in difficult states, such as Telangana, Karnataka and Himachal Pradesh, to victory. Earlier, under his leadership, the party had won in Punjab, too. 

In the battle of elections, Rahul Gandhi has become a mass leader more than any other BJP leader, including Modi, who was not a mass leader before he was sent to Gujarat by the BJP’s central leadership to power in 2001. Modi became a communally polarising leader after the Godhra incident and the 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. His main agenda was anti-Muslim and anti-Christian, projecting both as “foreign religions”, as part of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or RSS/BJP combine’s 100-year-old ideological campaign against these two religions.

Modi also built his image among communalised Hindus as a strong anti-Nehru family leader. He won the 2014 general election in an atmosphere of 10-year rule of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) with a non-political Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, in the saddle. By the time the 2014 elections arrived, both Singh and then Congress president Sonia Gandhi were not in a position to address even one major public meeting because of their health issues.

In that situation, Rahul Gandhi did not know how to fight Modi, who claimed that he was the first OBC (Other Backward Class) Prime Ministerial candidate and was the main campaigner of BJP.

AN UNUSUAL UPBRINGING

Having been brought up in an atmosphere of serious threat to his family after Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s (his grandmother) brutal assassination, a powerful Prime Minister, and Rajiv Gandhi’s (his father) assassination when he was Opposition leader, Rahul Gandhi did not know what India actually was. In particular, he did not know what the caste system was and why the system allows so much violence. 

But neither RSS nor Modi had any social or caste reform formula in owning up the OBC card that was played in that election. Social and caste reform was never in the agenda of RSS or Modi.

When this writer met Rahul Gandhi before the 2014 election, he had no clue how the OBC card would affect the election results. He was the main campaigner of the Congress party. Since he entered into politics just in the 2004 elections and the party came to power, he did not learn through political struggles of his own.  

India is a complex country. To counter an organization, like RSS’s, strategies, Rahul Gandhi needed to go through a personal struggle and reform.

YATRAS HAVE SHOWN RAHUL THE REAL INDIA

In order to fight such a powerful social divider network in power at Delhi, in the process of massive attack on his heritage and individuality, with well-organised anti-Rahul media in their hands, he had to evolve into a leader on his own and fight back. He had no way except to adopt new methods of social and political reform by understanding the Indian caste system and the agrarian situation, as well as the status of Indian education among the working castes.

Since Modi had shifted the discourse to caste from 2014, Rahul Gandhi had to study and perceive politics through his experience of struggle. His party structure was against a serious discourse on caste—particularly about the caste census, English medium education for all in rural areas and even to reduce the caste-based disconnect in society. Earlier, the Congress also allowed English medium education in the private sector for the rich upper castes. Its classical secularism ideology was not enough to fight RSS, Modi and his confidante Amit Shah.

However, Rahul Gandhi found a way in the first Bharat Jodo Yatra. Social media helped in changing his image. But the so-called mainstream media was always focusing one the question: do such yatras get votes? They did not see the serious implication of his slogan “Nafrat Ki Bazaar Mein, Mohabat Ki Dukan” (In Market of Hatred, a Shop of Love). They saw that slogan as just anti-BJP communalism. But it had deeper implications on the caste and untouchability system in India. There were no loving relationships between upper castes and Dalits/OBCs/Adivasis. Loving the neighbor is not part of the RSS Sanatana Parampara (tradition).

That slogan attracted educated Dalit and OBC youth, more than Muslim youth.

Read Also: Understanding the Growth of European Style Nationalism in India

Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra made that message clearer. Nobody from the RSS fold was trained to start a mass movement for social reform. The Indian big media did not see the new Rahul Gandhi – who spoke of socio-political reform with the aim of capturing power from RSS/BJP through the yatra, which had an anti-caste and anti-elite formulation.

When Rahul Gandhi became Leader of Opposition leader in Lok Sabha, with Congress winning 100 seats, he won half the battle. Mere vote manipulation is one thing, pushing the electoral process into social reform is another. No Indian leader after Ambedkar and Gandhi have tried such a method.

‘VOTE THEFT’ CAMPAIGN

With the “Vote Theft” campaign, as Rahul Gandhi himself said, he started “fighting the fire”. But his determined Bihar #VoterAdhikarYatra definitely is showing new mobilisation. This is not just an election winning issue. It is an issue of saving democracy itself.

Yet, the big media has quite deliberately confined Rahul Gandhi’s yatras and campaigns to vote and power politics. The upper castes, in all camps, not just in the RSS/BJP camp, do not want to project him as a socio-political reform leader. Such projection of a person from the Nehru family will have long-term implications. There is a strong history of anti-socio-political reform parampara among the upper castes. So far, the Nehru family is known as a “political power” family, as Nehru did not write much about social reform.   

The mainstream Indian media does not want serious caste and education reforms, as that will create a crisis in their deeply settled historical hegemony. The secularism of liberal and Left anti-communal campaigns do not include caste reform. The idea of a caste census unsettles this hegemony through ‘number consciousness’. Rahul Gandhi seems to have understood its deeper implication on the future of India, as ‘number consciousness’ among the oppressed castes helps them to deconstruct the silent minority’s double standards. 

The writer is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is ‘The Shudra Rebellion’. The views are personal.

https://www.newsclick.in/rahuls-systemic-reform-media-underplay

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

In their 100 years of history, the BJP-RSS combine has not produced a single Shudra/OBC leader with an agrarian base, like Patel or Kamaraj, from their party or organisation.

Kamaraj and Sardar patel. Image Courtesy: Wikipedia

In the context of the Congress OBC (Other Backward Classes) conference on July 25, 2025, in Delhi’s Talkatora Stadium, and the recent stand of Congress, particularly Rahul Gandhi, on the caste census, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) chose as Vice-President candidate, (technically as the National Democratic Alliance candidate) CP Radhakrishnan, the present Governor of Maharashtra, with the suggestion of the RSS or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Now they have started a campaign that he is an OBC from Tamil Nadu in order to use this appointment to gain votes in Tamil Nadu. This is also to convey to Congress that they would promote OBCs from the South.  Radhakrishnan comes from Goundar community, which is a middle rung OBC caste.  

Tamil Nadu has been in the hands of OBC leadership ever since the DMK (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagham) formed its first Government in 1967, except for some time during Jayalalithaa’s rule. The BJP wants break that Dravidian ideological rock bed by promoting an OBC person.   

It is a known that the BJP came to power on its own only with OBC support in a situation where the Congress lost OBC support in the post-Mandal period. The Congress party’s main support base till 2014 was Muslims, Dalits, adivasis and a section of upper castes. Its top leaders in governance were mainly from the upper castes

BJP-RSS Pretension of OBC Agenda

Historically, the RSS is known as an anti-Shudra agrarian force, without any ideological agenda to change the agrarian structure. It was always against land reforms. They opposed Congress Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s land reform law in the early 1970s and openly supported princely states by opposing abolition of Privy Purses.

Even Narendra Modi was not known in his entire life before becoming Prime Minister, of taking a pro-agrarian OBC stand. He mostly worked with Gujarati business class support with an anti-Muslim ideology. The same ideology is deep down in his thinking and working process now. His pro-OBC rhetoric is basically electoral.     

After choosing Radhakrishnan as its Vice-President candidate, BJP also started a vigorous campaign that its Prime Minister is an OBC, and it has several OBC Central ministers and two Chief Ministers.  Thus, they are trying to counter the gradual shift of OBCs to Congress.

Interestingly its two Vice-Presidents— Venkaiah Naidu and Jagdeep Dhankar, were Shudra/ OBCs — Kamma and Jat, respectively. Those castes are Shudra agrarian in their lived history. Both Naidu and Dhankar were humiliated and sent out. We all know that Naidu was not at all willing to take up that position leaving his cabinet post. He was the only somewhat known Shudra leader in that party, as he served as BJP president.

But the BJP-RSS forced him to become Vice-President and retired him before he attained the age of 75.

OBC Category and Shudraness

The OBC category came into being as a legal and constitutional category, which includes 90% of Shudras. A small section of them remained outside the OBC reservation when the Mandal Commission Report was implemented in the early 1990s. Even before that, when some states gave reservation to Backward Classes, some top end Shudra agrarian castes remained outside the reservation orbit with a view that such a tag to their caste would humiliate them.

The Kammas in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana and Jats in North India remained outside reservations. In states like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, all Shudhras are part of reservation.

Congress Relationship to Shudra/OBCs

Let us turn to Congress party’s history. The first ever tallest Shudra/OBC leader that emerged from that party was Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. He was the first leader to start an agrarian movement, Bardoli, against the British. In the South, a major Shudra/OBC leader who built mass farmers and toddy tappers movements against the British was Kamaraj Nadar. He was the tallest OBC leader in the country after the death of Patel. He could have become Prime Minister as president of the party, but Lal Bahadur Shastri was made the Prime Minister. After Shastri’s death, he allowed Indira Gandhi to become Prime Minister.

From Maharashtra, Y.B Chavan emerged as a great national leader. From Karnataka, Nijalingappa, a Shudra/OBC, was one of the top Congress leaders at the national level. They all challenged Nehru and Indira Gandhi and were leaders on their own merit, with an ideological vision different from that of Nehru and Indira Gandhi, and with a commitment to the Constitution.  

After the 1971 elections, Indira Gandhi did not allow any leader to emerge and hence the Shudra/OBCs started establishing their own leadership in different states and challenged Congress from outside. That gradually led to the weakening of the party.

The BJP-RSS combine has come out with a new image in 2014, that they will support OBC reservations and work for OBC welfare.

But in their hundred years of history, the BJP-RSS combine has not produced a single leader like Patel or Kamaraj Nadar from their organisation or party. Most of their OBC leaders were small, dependent leaders of no stature, who were given some visible political positions only after the Mandal period, more particularly after they started the Ram Temple movement.

No OBC leader from RSS or BJP is known for leading an agrarian movement. Every ideological issue was decided by the Brahmin leaders in RSS. The only leader, as the media now tells us, as the leader of decision-making capacity is said to be Modi, that too during his first term as Prime Minister. His second term onward, he is also going by the RSS direction.

The three farm laws that were meant to destroy the agrarian economy and hand over local markets from the Shudra/OBCs to monopoly industrialist houses were the handiwork of RSS. The strategy was planned by the RSS Brahmin leadership, and Modi implemented it because it helps his own corporate friends.

However, the farmers, who are essentially Shudra/ OBCs, fought and defeated the government agenda.

Rahul Gandhi Returns to Nehru Era

With his two agendas, Rahul Gandhi seems to have put the Congress on the Nehru era track. One is that he is fighting for a caste census at the national level and giving hope to the Shudra/OBCs so that they can play a critical national political role. Unless the Shudra/OBCs are part of the national party, they will just remain regional leaders. Now they hope to get a good position in the party and get the stature of Patel, Kamaraj Nadar, Nijalingappa, Y.B. Chavan and so on.

In the near future, the RSS-BJP combine will never give OBCs a position in the top leadership that can influence the ideology of the party or RSS. Whereas in the Congress, the Shudra/OBC leadership emerged and could compete with Nehru as Prime Minister. Sardar Patel and Kamaraj Nadar were such leaders. The RSS-BJP so far has not produced such Shudra/OBC leaders from agrarian bases. At best, they produced OBC leaders like Kalyan Singh and Uma Bharati, who played only anti-Muslim politics, that too from urban locations, with an anti-Muslim ideology.

To contest against BJP candidate CP Radhakrishnan, the INDIA bloc has chosen Justice Sudarshan Reddy from a Shudra agrarian background. He retired from the Supreme Court as a judge, and has a credible record of working to protect human and civil rights and constitutional guarantees all his life.

Recently, Reddy functioned as Chairman of the Independent Expert Group constituted by the Telangana government, to study the Socio, Economic, Educational, Employment, Political and Caste Survey, in which this author served as Vice-Chairman.

The nation should not take the propaganda of the RSS-BJP structures and monopoly media by face value, that they will empower OBCs by putting a doll-like OBC activist as Vice-President by RSS leaders.     

The writer is former Director, Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad. The views are personal.

https://www.newsclick.in/vice-presidential-election-congress-obcs-vs-rss-obcs

Until Rahul Gandhi, Congress didn’t realise that Patel and Ambedkar were not given their dues. The BJP helped Congress re-examine its nationalist roots and paved the way for research on these icons who have been relevant across caste and class lines

Rahul Gandhi’s engagement with the masses during his Bharat Jodo Yatra from Kanyakumari to Kashmir and Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra from Manipur to Mumbai seems to have changed his understanding about Ambedkar and Patel. 

KANCHA ILAIAH SHEPHERD

In the Congress party’s recent national legal conclave on “Constitutional Challenges — Perspectives and Pathways”, photos of Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and B R Ambedkar were prominently displayed. Notably, this is the first time that the pictures of these four — pillars of our freedom struggle and our modern nation-building — were displayed in the Congress office  that too in a public meeting.

Except for Ambedkar, the rest of them are from the Congress party itself. However, Patel was slowly sidelined after Nehru took over the party. Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were always considered the guiding lights of the Congress.

This was evident in the naming of the institutions — libraries, universities, airports, railway stations, and memorials — during Congress rule. The party made this mistake because it did not want to recognise the caste background of leaders like Ambedkar and Patel, and how their caste identities were shaping the electorate. Soon, the BJP appropriated Sardar Patel, which reached its peak when PM Modi built the tallest statue of Patel in Gujarat.

Ambedkar was first revered by Dalits, and he then slowly emerged as a social justice icon. His image is now used to mobilise voters. However, until Rahul Gandhi, Congress didn’t realise that Patel and Ambedkar were not given their dues. The BJP helped Congress re-examine its nationalist roots and paved the way for research on these icons who have been relevant across caste and class lines.

Rahul Gandhi’s realisation during Yatras

Gandhi’s mass contact during his Bharat Jodo Yatra from Kanyakumari to Kashmir and the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra from Manipur to Mumbai seems to have changed his understanding about Ambedkar and Patel.

Ambedkar emerged as one of the tallest national icons in the post-Mandal era, much to the chagrin of Hindutva intellectuals. Arun Shourie’s book Worshipping False Gods was written as a response to his ascent in the mass consciousness during this period. In the recent past, Shashi Tharoor, despite conflicting ideologies, also had to write a book on Ambedkar.

Shourie’s mindset could also be found in Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who in Parliament contemptuously said that it has become a fashion to say Ambedkar.

Immediately after that, Gandhi turned Ambedkar into his party’s icon with the slogan: Jai Bapu, Jai Bheem and Jai Samvidhan. He told Shah in no uncertain terms that Ambedkar had already joined Gandhi and Nehru in the nationalist imagination.

A new Congress in the making

Before 2014, PM Modi gave a call for a “Congress Mukt Bharat”. He started appropriating Gandhi, Ambedkar, besides Patel. Modi used Patel’s image both in Gujarat and outside the state. However, Patel, a Shudra/OBC, was the first rural man to connect the Congress nationalist movement with his Bardoli farmers’ agitation that was organised against increased land revenue taxes. It was only after that that Gandhi entered into the farmers’ struggles against the British. But Congress forgot to see the link between the farmers’ movements and Patel.

However, Rahul Gandhi brought Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Ambedkar together and placed them on the party’s banner, along with their portraits on the walls of the new party office. His upholding of the caste census as “societal X-Ray and protection to the Constitution” during the 2024 elections also helped him make Patel and Ambedkar party icons. The erstwhile Congress leaders thought that caste discourse and secularism were contradictory. But that is a misplaced reading of the Indian social system.

This shift in the Congress under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi made the BJP fall short of the majority mark in the last Lok Sabha elections. “Pappu”, as Gandhi was scornfully called, has suddenly become a serious contender for the PM post.

While Modi turns 75 — the age that his party had set as an ideal retirement age for its leaders — Congress does not disappear from Indian politics. The Congress not only survives, but it appears to embrace a new phase after 140 years. That is a good sign.

The writer is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is The Shudra Rebellion

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/how-congress-brings-ambedkar-and-sardar-patel-on-the-same-table-10189185/lite/

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

1 Hour ago

A heart valve that saved a life for 46 years symbolises how Christian missions in India fused faith with modern science. Organisations which say they represent Hinduism and Islam have yet to match that achievement.

Representative image. Photo: Katherine Hanlon/Unsplash

Real journalism holds power accountable

Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.Contribute Now

For centuries, Hinduism, Islam, and Christianity have been the three most visible religions in India. How each engages with superstition and science is a question worth close examination. Of all the modern sciences, the most important are the science of production and medical science. Both of them, however, are dependent on a modern system of education.

Let me share a story. On June 7, 2025 Kancha Kattaiah, 77, died peacefully while sitting on the commode in the washroom as the artificial valve fixed in his heart failed. It had been inserted in his heart 46 years earlier; the surgery was done at the Christian Medical College (CMC) Hospital Vellore, Tamil Nadu, in 1979.

It was a first generation steel valve developed by the Edward Life Science company of America in the 1960s. It was an innovation by the company to save patients from the dangerous heart disease of losing a valve due to rheumatic fever or for other reasons. Kattaiah had rheumatic fever over and above a massive smallpox attack in his childhood. In the process, he was diagnosed with a loss of the mitral valve in his heart. If the artificial valve was not invented thanks to the advanced and combined medical science of modern allopathy and surgery, he would have died when he was hardly 32 or 33.

Kattaiah was from a small village shepherd-farmer family from Telangana, which is 600 km away from Vellore. He travelled to CMC risking everything. According to doctors who operated upon such patients and replaced valves in recent times, his survival for so long with a single valve was a medical miracle. I know these details because he was my brother.

In 1960 Dr. Albert Starr, a surgeon at Oregon Health and Sciences University, successfully implanted the first Starr-Edwards mitral valve in the US. In India, the first such surgery was done at CMC Vellore in 1962. In those days, no other hospital in India had that kind of surgical equipment and trained cardiac surgeons.

Though it was a private hospital, it was compassionate in its culture and values. They were not in the money-making business like the private hospitals of today. Grace and compassion as human values were constructed into the Christian mission thought. Medical innovation in the Christian world was part of that thought.

CMC was started in Vellore by an American Christian missionary woman Dr. Ida. S. Scudder in 1900. This was the first ever established full fledged hospital in India. The government-owned AIIMS was established only in 1956 in Delhi. The Christian Medical College became a model medical college and hospital in India in the post-Independent period as well.

For a long time, the CMC survived with American mission mobilisation of resources, technology and trained manpower. The American church network helped this kind of medical science develop within America and also in other parts of the world. India is a major beneficiary of this mission work.

In Western India, the first schools, including a teacher training college, were started by the same American Mission. Savitribai Phule and Fatima Shaik were trained in that teacher training centre.

A question arises in my mind – why did Hindus and Muslims in India not develop Ayurvedic or Unani hospitals with their own innovations in surgical science like allopathic hospitals? After all, Hindus and Muslims claim the Ayurveda and Unani forms of medicine are part of their culture and traditions. Why didn’t Hindu missions or a ‘social service’ organisation like the RSS, which claims that it is unparalleled in the world, or a globally connected Muslim organisation like the Jamaat-e-Islami, develop their own Ayurvedic and Unani medical colleges and hospitals that could match the American Christian missionary one like the CMC, established 125 years ago in India?

The Satya Sai Baba mission established a major hospital in Puttaparthi, but with the same Western, allopathic medicine, not Ayurveda. Mata Amrutanandamayi, who runs her own mission, runsanother  allopathy hospital in Kochi, Kerala.

The RSS’S claims and the reality

The ruling RSS claims in its post 2014 period of hegemony that ancient India – by which they mean Hindutva – is the repository of all knowledge. So why it  did not develop Ayurveda as an equally advanced medical science like allopathy which the Christian missions did? While the RSS/BJP want to claim that Hindu texts contain all the wisdom of science, why did those books not produce an innovation of something like a valve which could save a heart patient like Kattaiah?

Unless the superstitious character of a religion is not fought with rational thought, scientific innovations do not happen. No individual scientist can innovate unless a rational secular society comes into being. But the RSS wants to remove the word secularism from the constitution. They need to study the CMC’s functioning to understand – and respect –  how medical science operates in a combination of religion, reason and secularism.

Unless a religious philosophy is science friendly, as a sister evolutionary thought process, religion will just slip into more and more superstition without allowing science to emerge and advance from its fold. Unfortunately, the self-styled champions of Hinduism and Islam have done exactly the same in India. Hence they still depend on Christian education and health and other science institutions and innovations in the West.

In fact, for a long time before and even after independence, Christian schools and hospitals were the main source of education and health for the Hindu and Muslim elite. Shashi Tharoor, who wrote Why I am a Hindu, got his English education in St. Stephens College, Delhi.

When Kattaiah suffered from rheumatic fever in the 1960s, it was the Baptist Mission Hospital, Hanamkoda, Warangal that cured him. This was established in 1902. Kattaiah’s illiterate mother stayed with him as her son was treated for more than 20 days along with getting a free supply of food and medicines. This kind of medical help was possible because of the hospital’s spiritual philosophy of compassion and innovation.

Why haven’t the RSS or the Jamaat-e-Islami as religious mission organisations offered such service to Hindus and Muslims – not to speak of all Indians – in critical areas like health and education?  If religious organisations keep on communalising their own civil societies, they cannot produce imaginative scientists. Communalism breeds fear and hatred of the ‘Other’ where compassion and grace towards people from other religions would be projected as weakness.

Twenty five years after the establishment of the CMC in Vellore, the RSS was formed as a missionary organisation. What have they done in the domains of education and medicine for Indians at large in the past hundred years?

This question is important because they oppose everything foreign. If that foreign artificial valve was not put in Kattaiah’s heart he would not have survived for 46 years after surgery.

In the medical field, the RSS and its other wings want to promote Ayurveda in schools and colleges. The RSS and its other organs like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) keep propagating that their ancient medical knowledge is superior to Western knowledge. Why then did the RSS and its associates not establish a hospital like CMC and establish a life science research centre within the Ayurveda tradition?

Why the Muslim elite, like the Hindutva elite, rushes to allopathic medical centres

On the contrary, they went on promoting under their shadow several superstitious networks run by Babas, or remedies like cow urine therapy and so on, which are the opposite of established science.

The Muslim emperors and sultans who ruled large parts of India for more than a thousand years may have established some Unani medical centres but they also did not develop their own surgical medicine. The Unani medical centres work on oral medicine treatment. There is no surgical science developed by Unani medicine.

That is why the Muslim elite, like the Hindutva elite, rushes to allopathic medical centres for emergency and critical surgeries. In fact, the rich among them go to the US for treatment if it is a heart or brain surgical issue.

Leave alone ancient and medieval Hindu pundits, even the present Hindutva missionary networks like the RSS and others pushed Hinduism into the process of superstition. Indian Islam also did not allow Islam to emerge into a religion that could negotiate with science.

Christianity that started as a blind belief based faith slowly emerged into a religion that began to establish a relationship with science as its sister, slowly overcoming its superstitious dogmas. In my view Hinduism and Islam have deeper relations with superstition by not allowing science to co-exist with them.

Science and religion need to be treated as part of the same evolutionary process in human civilisation, whereas superstition is a negation of both.

Superstition needs to be fought on an everyday basis. If religion allows superstition to grow, like weeds in the crop, it kills the scientific thinking of humans. This is where these two religions need to undergo huge reform within themselves, allowing secular thought and science to develop in their civil societies.

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is, The Shudra Rebellion.

https://thewire.in/author/kancha-ilaiah-shepherd

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

In a rare theoretical broadside, the Congress veteran has accused the ruling dispensation of plotting an ‘ideological coup’ to replace constitutional democracy

RSS/BJP’s future direction in changing the present constitutional democracy into a

‘Theocratic Corporate State. She shared this in her written message at the party’s national legal conclave on ‘Constitutional Challenges – Perspectives and Pathways’, at Indira Bhavan, New Delhi,

She said ‘the Constitution is under siege as the ruling BJP is using its power to dismantle the very framework it long opposed.

Further, Sonia accused the BJP-RSS of plotting “an ideological coup” to replace “our democratic republic with a theocratic corporate state serving the powerful few”.

Congress takes up mantle

This kind of serious political economic formulation about the RSS/BJP’s agenda has not been done by any Congress politician in the past.

The communists have left the political arena to the Congress to not only fight the RSS’s socio-political and economic ideoloav, but to formulate new theoretical ideas. They are no longer in a position to formulate creative political economy concepts that could expose the RSS/BJP caste-spiritual ideology. This is because they have not yet grappled with the caste ideology.

The regional parties cannot formulate such impactful nationally and internationally useful concepts that draw battle lines for ideological and political struggles.

After Rahul Gandhi emerged as a powerful socio-political reformer and agenda setting

leader in the country, Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi seem to have decided to fully go with his fight against RSS/BJP.

Bringing caste into focus

The stand on caste census, Ambedkar’s ideology, ‘bringing back’ Sardar Vallabai Patel to the Congress fold, and openly attacking Manu Dharma Shastra, as an RSS foundational ancient text which is an antithesis of Ambedkar’s Constitution, is totally a new phenomenon.

The fact that Mahatma Gandhi, Ambedkar, Nehru and Patel’s photos were put very visibly on the conclave stage is an indication of a major shift in the ideological strategy.

Added to this, Sonia Gandhi for the first time acknowledged the role of Dr Ambedkar in a written statement as architect of the present Constitution in the context of the RSS proposal to remove the words ‘secularism and socialism’ from the preamble. This has a serious basis for her new formulation.

Taking a call

This may help the fence sitters in the Congress and those who are sceptical about Rahul Gandhi’s caste census, ‘Jai Bapu, Jai Bheem and Jai Smavidhan’ slogan may

come on board.

The caste census campaign of Rahul has already got Doubting Thomases in the party to come round. They have nowhere to go, as the RSS/BJP too has agreed to a caste census.

The Shashi Tharoor kind of leaders may move out for their future moral death. The RSS will use such leaders and throw them out. Sonia proved to be a person ready to face the consequences.

She said: “Now they seek to erase socialism and secularism, pillars of Ambedkar’s vision of equal citizenship. This is… an ideological coup replacing our democratic republic with a theocratic corporate state serving the powerful few.” She was also candid in saying that it “betrayed Dalits, Adivasis, OBCs”.

Theocratic Corporate State

The fundamental inbuilt ideological issue with the establishment of the Theocratic Corporate State is deeply related to the future life of Shudra/OBC/SC/STs in India.

Historically, the Manu Dharma is a pro-Varna Dharma legal framework, wherein the Dwija castes could have monopoly over the Shudra and Chandalas spiritually, socially, economically and politically. Though the RSS was known as a Brahmin-Bania organisation for a long time, during the Narendra Modi-Amit Shah regime it turned into a Bania-Brahmin monopoly network with Banias leading in many fields and with control over monopoly capital.

Modi’s OBC background is a mask. After 11 years of Modi-Shah rule, the way the RSS allowed them to ruin the agrarian and artisanal economy is a pointer to the caste control monopoly with a massive privatisation process. The three farm laws that were defeated by Shudra farmers were a pointer to that.

Kautilya’s Arthashastra

The framework of the Theocratic Corporate State that RSS wants to establish has theoretical foundations in Kautilya’s

Arthashastra as well.

Kautilya says, “The people consisting of four castes (Shudra, Skatriya, Vaishya, Brahmin) and four orders of religious (Hindu) life, when governed by the king with sceptre will keep to their respective paths”

When the RSS talks of Sanatana Dharma it talks about this central ideology of Kautilya, which got legalised through Manu Dharma that Sonia Gandhi is talking about in her message.

The Shudra/OBCs/Dalits/Adivasis have no ^ right to become priests in the spiritual realm and no right to become the owner of Dhana (wealth), which, in a monopolistic way, was turned into Gupta Dhana (untaxed wealth).

Under sceptre of Dwijas

The state is completely under the control of Dwija power wielders, which the RSS top leaders consistently believed. And also the wealth in a modern capitalist form, which Sonia Gandhi calls corporate capital, can never be allowed to be shared by the Shudra/Dalit productive forces.

The productive forces as per the RSS world view, must always be under the sceptre of Dwijas, who do not participate in production.

They come to own the phala (fruits) of their labour as property, wealth, land, industry, mall and so on.

Also read | With all credits for Sonia, Revanth govt retells story of Telangana movement

After Jawaharlal Nehru’s formulation of Democratic Socialism concept to make India a welfare state where all castes have a right to own wealth and duty to participate in wealth creation, the RSS attacked him as an un-Indian concept builder. He was attacked

as a lackey of communist Russia.

In an unexpected turn, Sonia Gandhi revealed what she described as the RSS’s underlying future vision for the political economy of Sanatana Dharma — a theocratic corporate state in which Shudras, OBCs, Dalits, and Adivasis would remain under complete control. Her remarks drew media attention, particularly in an environment where much of the corporate press is perceived as being anti-Congress.

We know that she hardly speaks in a theoretical language. However, she did now.

Threat to OBC future

No Shudra/OBC/Dalit/Adivasi working in the

RSS/BJP camp could understand its implication to his/her own children’s future because the notion of Hindu Rashtra is deep down in their mind and it works like Karma siddhanta. They are constantly made to seek solace in Kumbh Melas, Teertha Yatras and singing devotional songs.

Serious statecraft is out of their world view.

The OBC/Dalit/Adivasi ministers of BJP are kept busy in attacking the Opposition. They know that power is not given to them to oppose Manu Dharma but to advance it. But there lies the danger for all the Shudra/OBC/Dalit/Adivasis in future.

The theories of Hindutva political economy are being built by its foreign English educated intellectuals, while RSS/BJP keeps opposing English education for the productive masses. Hardly socio-political thinkers emerge from OBCs.

European context

In the European context, the role of Theocratic Feudal State was understood by Machiavelli in the early 16th century. But theocratic corporate state theory was not debated in the post-modern political economy in Europe because the state and religion were seriously separated.

The Muslim world is already living in a theocratic corporate state. The Indian Muslim thinkers also cannot fight the

theocratic corporate state. We are not sure whether the Dwija political economists, even sympathetic to Congress, enter into debate on Sonia Gandhi’s formulation.

There are caste interests involved in this battle, even if they pretend that they belong to ‘No Caste’, as the Telangana caste survey has shown millions exist in that category.

Now that this theory has come from Sonia Gandhi, a veteran leader of few words, let us wait and see how political economy pundits of varied ideologies of India debate the concept.

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

Kancha laiah Shepherd is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is The Clash of Cultures – Hindutva – Mullah Conflicting Ethics.

by Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd

After the Congress Shudra/OBC Bhagedary Nyay Sammelan ( Participatory Justice  Conference) in Talkatora stadium of Delhi took place on 25 July, 2025 a new social justice discourse began in India. In 140 years of existence of the Congress party it was the first ever Shudra/OBC conference with a path breaking initiative of Rahul Gandhi, the Opposition Leader of Lok Sabha and well known Congress leader from Gandhi-Nehru family.

 As a non-Congress special invitee  I spoke in that conference. My seven minute speech has rattled the RSS/BJP ranks. What I spoke was as under:

“I really congratulate this revolutionary movement in congress history. Congress liberated us, particularly the OBCs Dalits, Adivasis from the British. Mahatma Gandhi, Jawarlal Nehru, Sardar, Vallavad Patel, and Ambedkar liberated us from the oppressive British. But after that, there was no leader of national stature, international stature, to liberate us from the caste oppression of RSS BJP type. And once this RSS/ BJP came to power, ruled for 11 years, all the OBCs started going into that oppressors’ fold saying oppress us more, oppress us more. We will be slaves.

I was crying in my bed. And I was listening to Rahul Gandhi speak about the country and the nation. In  (year) 2021, in this very hall, women and men, we were just few hundreds, from the congress party fold, some intellectuals and party leaders, gathered and started this revolutionary movement in OBCs (This refers to 2021 OBC conclave in Talkatora stadium and passing of OBC Delhi declaration). And in the 21 first century, if there is no single leader who can liberate us from this bloody caste, which destroyed us, we will not be liberated because a Modi like leader has come to destroy us. And I found Rahul Gandhi is the only leader who can liberate us from this oppressive, destructive caste system. Today, he started (taking) steps.

His first step was Bharat Yodo Yatra. His second step was Bharat Yodo Nyay  Yatra for ourselves. And the third step, he started getting caste census done. This was historic. And I’m the vice chairman of the expert committee that the congress government appointed (to study the Telangana socio,economic, educational, employment, political Caste Survey) data . We have seen Telangana congress data that, you know there are, (more than) 56% OBCs.

The Telangana government asked for 42% reservation for OBCs. Is it just or not? Tell us. Is it okay or not? 42 is okay or not?

42 (percent) we should achieve or not? We should achieve. Why? Because in Telangana, the upper caste are only 9.9%, but they are getting 10% reservation (under EWS quota). Look at the tragedy.

And Rahulji has come to change that entirely. That is a revolution.  

Nobody imagined and I think BJP and RSS  have never imagined that a person born in the Nehru- Gandhi family would give a slogan “Jai Bapu, Jai Bheem and Jai Samvidhan” (constitution) one day. That is Rahul Gandhi.

So today, to liberate OBCs this meeting is organized. Once OBCs are liberated from BJP, BJP will not be in power. It will never come to power at all.

 Rahul Gandhi is facing hundreds of cases. Wherever he goes, there are cases. There are now OBC  lawyers , Dalit lawyers, Adivasi lawyers across the country. They must stand up for him and protect him from going to jail. That is our role.

We the intellectuals, the universities, the colleges, the students, and women have a role to play in this revolution. I have never seen a young woman (or man) who stood for women like Rahul Gandhi in my 73 years of life. That is the leader that the same Indira Gandhi, the same Rajiv Gandhi, the same Jawarlal Nehru, whom they are abusing, family produced.  Therefore, this is the first historic major Congress meeting of all OBC leaders sitting here on the dais ever since the Congress  was born. For the first time because of him.

And lastly, yesterday, I visited Indira Bhavan. I was so thrilled. The moment I entered, there was a big Ambedkar’s photo. There was a Gandhi photo. There was  Patel there, and there was Jaharlal Nehru. You know what their caste background is?

Gandhi was from Bania caste. Ambedkar was from Dalit caste. Patel was from Shudra, OBC caste, who liberated my own state from Nizam, and Nehru was from Brahmin caste. Rahul is a mix of all castes today. He’s a mix of all castes, and therefore, he is our liberator.

I SEE HIM LIKE MARTIN LUTHER KING IN AMERICA . And we will work with him. I’m an intellectual. I’m a writer. I’m not a congress member.

But as long as I live, my pen will work for writing for Rahul Gandhi and standing for this nation’s liberation”.  

 Amit Malviya the media head of the BJP says this in his X, while tagging my entire speech.     

“The intent of Congress’s “Bhagidari Nyay Sammelan” is under the scanner because of who they chose to promote. Kancha Ilaiah, notorious for his open contempt for Hinduism, its deities, and cultural practices, was given centre stage. His record of insulting Hindu gods and advocating for an Abrahamic shift is no secret. By giving Ilaiah a platform: •Congress has once again exposed its deep-rooted anti-Hindu bias, despite claiming to represent backward Hindu communities. •It’s a calculated attempt to detach OBCs and SCs from their Hindu identity and push them toward a divisive, anti-Hindu narrative. And Rahul Gandhi sharing the stage with Ilaiah isn’t accidental, it’s consistent. He has endorsed Ilaiah’s anti-Hindu books in the past, and now he’s openly legitimising him in front of millions. This is not empowerment. This is a direct insult to Hindu beliefs”.

A Brahminic Hindutva web news portal, The Commune, picks up the thread from Amit Malviya and writes an editorial in which parts of my speech was quoted. It says: 

“On 25 July 2025 at the party’s OBC-focused “Bhagidari Nyay Sammelan”, Congress scion Rahul Gandhi shared the stage with anti-Hindu bigot Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd. This is my speech transcription according to the portal:

Look at the Sub-Title: Kancha Ilaiah’s Speech: Glorifying Rahul, Demonizing Hindus

 “In his speech, Ilaiah painted a dystopian picture of India under BJP rule while hailing Rahul Gandhi as the messiah of OBCs, “Congress liberated us, particularly the OBC, Dalit, Adivasi, from the British – Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and Ambedkar liberated us from the oppressive British, but after that there was no leader of national structure, international structure to liberate us from the caste oppression of RSS BJP type and once this RSS BJP have come to power, rule for 11 years, all the OBCs started going into that oppressors fold that oppress more, we will be slaves.”

He then emotionally declared, “I was crying in my bed, listening to Rahul Gandhi speak in 2021… In the 21st century, if there is no leader to liberate us from this bloody caste system, we will remain oppressed. I found that Rahul Gandhi is the only leader who can liberate us.”

Rahul Gandhi as the “Modern-Day Ambedkar”

Ilaiah went on to compare Rahul Gandhi to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Martin Luther King, claiming, “His Bharat Jodo Yatra, Nyay Yatra, and caste census are revolutionary… He is the mix of all castes – Baniya (Gandhi), Dalit (Ambedkar), OBC (Patel), and Brahmin (Nehru). That’s why he is our liberator.”

He further urged OBCs, Dalits, and Adivasis to rally behind Rahul,
“Once OBCs are liberated from BJP, it will never come to power again… OBC lawyers, Dalit lawyers, and Adivasi lawyers must protect Rahul Gandhi from going to jail.”

The Commune also picks up all other arguments of Amit Malviya that I have been a Hindu hater and the  editor picks up quotes from my writings and speeches about some Hindu-Brahminic deities and puts quotations  to show me as a demon.  In my speech in that conference there was no reference to Hinduism as religion or Hindu deities.

It was a panic reaction to my speech that received unexpected applause from the OBC masses gathered in the stadium and went viral online. Interesting aspect was I was the only person who spoke in English in that meeting. Irrespective of Central, South, North and East OBC Indians all understood that English speech and responded in a manner that no one imagined. Particularly when I said Rahul Gandhi is Martin Luther King Jr, in India of our times, the applause was not only massive, but spontaneous. The masses knew who Martin Luther King was and what they did to black slaves in America. They also seem to have known that he was the only socio-political reformer who got a Nobel Prize for fighting for the liberation of slaves in America.  

My speech was a spontaneous one. It generated the mass response, enthusiasm and euphoria in the stadium. I knew that only Rahul could be such a leader in a 140 years old party’s life, who could allow such an exclusive OBC mass meeting of leaders, cadres could take place in the capital city. I know that the black slaves could be liberated only by a determined leader like Martin Luther King Jr and only Rahul could work for the Shudra/OBC liberation within the framework of Indian constitution as Martin Luther King did within the framework of the American constitution. My comparison was apt.  

 Rahul Gandhi has been facing serious life threatening situations and also cases– ED interrogations, court cases and humiliating abuse by  the BJP/RSS leaders and cadre. No opposition leader in any global democratic country is  facing as many cases on petty issues as Rahul Gandhi is. To survive the pro-RSS/BJP, leader, cadres and monopoly houses running media attacks needs a thick skinned leader with a commitment to common people. Rahul has been enduring it for the last eleven years quite bravely.

A MAN GROWN IN TRAGEDIES   

Rahul has grown in an atmosphere of Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi’s brutal and unimagined murder. With the psychological crisis, trauma to enter into politics and survive at an early age in 2004 was a difficult decision. In his childhood and adulthood his life was always fear stricken. Only the ten years of UPA rule from 2004 to 2014 gave that family some confidence. But 2014 the RSS bringing Modi-Monopoly Bania capital combination to power has thrown that family into a much deeper crisis. From then on the RSS/BJP entered into the caste capital hegemonic new game. The Shudra/OBCs got into a new RSS/BJP Dwija cobweb. Modi has been playing a very tricky game with the life and economy of the Shudra/OBCs since then.     

The BJP/RSS regime created an atmosphere for him and the family that needs to be understood with a culture ofgrace and positive human will. I think I do have such grace and human will. Hence I compared him with Martin Luther King Jr and the OBC masses understood me and Rahul. I was not indulging in sycophancy for any position of power from him. I did not seek any such position of power when he was in a position to give. My contact with him took place when he had no power.

His own determination made him fight for his own self-respect in a situation of all around attacks from the ruling dispensation at Delhi.    

Till 2019 elections he appeared directionless. But once he resigned from the party president position owning the moral responsibility and began to fight as an ordinary member of the party there emerged a new reform-politician in Rahul. He was willing to face martyrdom for the sake of change.  

A CHANGE MAKER FROM THAT FAMILY   

A new change maker politician was born in Rahul Gandhi’s marathon Bharat Jodo Yatra from 7 September, 2022 to 19 January, 2023. It got synthesized in understanding caste and the Shudra/OBC question in his second Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra from Manipur to Mumbai, starting from January 24, 2024 and ending on March 16, 2024.

In December 2021 he was to attend an OBC conclave (conference) in the same stadium. But he did not attend because the Congress party had not taken a clear stand on the question of caste census.  More than his reading of literature on caste his personal contact with masses, talking to people, leaders and intellectuals, of which the majority Shudra/OBC/Dalit/Adivasi agrarian, artisanal and labouring masses, unemployed youth, in the two yatras, he seems to have formulated a clear idea that Caste is still very strong Indian reality.  And also caste oppression does not persist among Dalits only. The Shudra/OBC oppressed  status and the indifference of Congress to that massive number of productive forces of India benefited the RSS/BJP combine.  Rahul had to take a difficult decision given  the history of the party.

The Shudra/OBC masses constitute a vast majority, not just only in numbers but are backward in education, employment and ownership of industrial assets. Particularly they are far behind in English medium education that has become power in the job markets of India. Leave alone the ranks of RSS/BJP, even in his own Congress party no upper caste leader had such ground level touch and the human will to accept the truth as truth by then.

He formulated, perhaps, in his own way that the OBC question is key in Indian transformation.  That is where he also learnt how to listen about the caste oppression of people. His Kashimiri Brahmin ancestral background played a role in hiding that truth from him from his childhood.  Now he overcame that generation’s caste cultural burqa.

OBC PM HELPING ALL NON-OBCs AND MONOPOLY HOUSES  

Whether the OBC Prime Minister Naredra Modi or the RSS Sarsnachalak Mohan Bhagwat had the will to learn the truth as truth is a serious question. They shifted the whole state and private wealth into the hands of the Dwija monopoly Bania houses is a known fact. Earlier many Congress leaders keep on talking as if the Caste, particularly the Shudra/OBC category, does not exist in India. This is pretentious ‘No Caste’ category leadership while using the upper caste privilege for their promotion.  

Rahul has come out of such pretensions.  

For example, in American history two major leaders emerged to fight racism and human oppression: one was Abraham Lincoln and the second major most reformist leader was Martin Luther King Jr. One fought for black slave liberation from power as the president of America in the 19^th century, the second one fought black slave liberation and for their equal rights in a much more organized way, in the 20^thcentury. American and global history remembers them much more than the American freedom fighters or presidents. Both of them were shot dead by the white racists.

In fact Martin Luther King Jr’s birthday is celebrated as a national or federal holiday because his contribution is much more important. Why? He was the liberator of most oppressed people in American history. The history of Shudras is a more complicated and long persisted slavery and semi-slavery.

Rahul’s speech in the Delhi Congress OBC Sammelan has shown his evolved understanding of the OBC question.

In my whole English speech there was reference to Hinduism in that Sammelan . How did Amit Malviya and the RSS/BJP media networks saw anti-Hindu talk there? The RSS/BJP ideologues in order to hide their Brahminic caste tirade on the Shudra/OBC food producers use the word Hindu to mislead the Shudra/OBCs. But that does not work for long.   

Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd is a political theorist, social activist and author. His latest book is The Shudra Rebellion. 

https://countercurrents.org/author/kancha-ilaiah-shepherd/